Frequently Asked Questions
Getting ready for P&T
1. How do I find out the criteria by which I will be evaluated on for my next promotion?
The criteria are provided, by track, in the Faculty Tracks section of the website.
2. How can I find out if I am ready for my next promotion?
There are multiple sources for information and advice: your department chair, division chief, or mentor, or members of your department’s P&T committee and the School of Medicine P&T committee. In addition, two workshops are offered annually: Promotion and Tenure for Junior and New Faculty and P&T: Polishing the Portfolio.
Building your portfolio
3. How do I format my P&T Portfolio?
Please see the Portfolio content checklist.
The candidate and department chair (or division chief) discuss the list of referees. The list will include internal referees, external referees, and independent referees. Each referee must be identified as originating from either the candidate or the chair. Please review Criteria for Selecting Referees for full information.
5. How does my performance as an educator influence the likelihood that I will be promoted?
Education is one of the three missions of the School of Medicine. Excellence in one of the three domains (Education, Research, Patient Care) is required for promotion to Associate Professor; excellence in two domains is required in order to achieve tenure or promotion to Professor. Demonstration of educational excellence will therefore be required for everyone in the Academic Investigator or Clinician Educator tracks and may be chosen as one of the two domains of excellence for those in the Clinician Investigator track. Thorough documentation of your performance is essential for demonstration of excellence.
6. How do I document excellence in education?
Please refer to this guide: Documentation of Excellence: Teaching/Education.
7. How do I document clinical excellence?
This is dependent upon your department, your role, and your job description. For more information regarding clinical excellence specific to your role and job description, you may consult with your department chair, division chief, the chair of your department’s P&T Committee, or current members of the SoM P&T Committee.
8. How do I demonstrate excellence in research?
- Peer-reviewed publications, as documented in your CV, including both impact factors and citation record. The Health Sciences Library can quickly and easily help you find this information. Please see their DIY guide, or request a consultation.
- Extramural and intramural research funding
- Documented impact such as invited publications and invited extramural presentations
- Further information regarding research excellence, by track, is available in the P&T Policy or through the Faculty Tracks section of our website.
9. How do I document research collaboration?
- Nature of contributions should be described in the annotations to the bibliography of your CV
- Document your role as co-investigator on research projects
- Documented by statements in your internal and external letters of reference
10. How does my extramural funding impact my likelihood of being promoted?
Promotion and the award of tenure of Academic and Clinical Investigators requires funding via NIH R01 grants or comparable grants.
11. Does it count if my grant gets a good score but is not funded?
For faculty in tracks dependent upon research excellence, and who demonstrate sufficient funding credentials for the requested promotion, evidence that a proposal was highly evaluated is favorable, but does not stand alone.
12. How do I document extramural reputation beyond the University of Virginia (regional/national/international)?
- Invitations to speak at other institutions; or at regional, national, or international meetings
- Study sections and grant-review panels
- Editorships and membership on editorial boards
- Replication of clinical, research, or educational models at other universities or institutions
- Invited expert testimony for governmental agencies
- Leadership roles in regional, national, or international societies
- National Board memberships, or role as examiner or question writer
- Named lectureships
- Invited publications
- Evidence of impact of your publications
13. How are my publications evaluated?
Publication record, as documented in your CV, should demonstrate continued scholarship. Further, publications are evaluated by their impact on the field as evidenced by the number of your peer-reviewed papers, the ranking of the journals in which you have published, and the citation record of your papers. Other evidence of impact may include comments in the letters of reference and documentation of honors accorded because of the impact of your publications. In evaluating submitted publications it is helpful to the P&T committee if each publication is accompanied by a very brief explanation of why the publication is considered important.
14. How do I find the impact factor and ranking for a journal?
The impact factor is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The Health Sciences Library can quickly and easily help you find this information. Please see their DIY guide, or request a consultation.
15. How many publications do I need?
This is an integral of quality and quantity, related to both your rank and track, so there is no single magic number. Please note: a few papers in premier journals may count as much as many papers in journals of moderate rank.
16. Do non-refereed publications help me at all?
Invited publications may speak to regional or national reputation. However, peer-reviewed publications are essential for promotion on the AI and CI track.
17. How is my local committee service evaluated?
Good citizenship implies participation in functional activities of your Department and the School of Medicine. However, service on local committees is not highly weighted unless you serve in a leadership role or directly contribute to notable committee accomplishments. Note: Service on national committees is highly regarded and should be documented for proof of extramural reputation (see item 12 for more information).
18. What happens if I come up for Promotion/Tenure early?
In cases of candidates applying early, the P&T Committee will adhere to your track’s criteria more stringently. The earlier you are nominated, the more stringently the criteria will be interpreted. Please review the P&T Policy and your track’s criteria very carefully to be sure you are ready.
19. What if the Departmental P&T Committee does not recommend me for P&T?
The candidate has the option to appeal to the Dean, as documented in the P&T timeline. Departmental P&T Committees meet in September of each year. Department committees review candidate portfolios and notify candidates not recommended for advancement. Candidates not recommended for advancement must appeal to the Dean’s Office by October 8, 2018.
Appeals to the Dean’s Office are reviewed by an ad hoc committee consisting of: the Senior Associate Dean, the Chair of the SoM P&T Committee, and a faculty member within the department and at the appropriate rank, as identified by the candidate.
20. What is the SOM process for recommendation/denial of P&T?
The SOM P&T Committee deliberates based on all P&T application information, and then provides recommendations to the Dean. Candidates not supported for advancement by the dean will be informed by February 1, 2019.
21. What if the SOM does not recommend me?
The Department Chair has the right to appeal unfavorable outcomes, but the appeal may only be based on the presentation of new information. Any candidate not recommended by the SoM P&T Committee may submit new information to their Department Chair. It is at the discretion of the Chair to carry the appeal forward. Appeal documents must be submitted by the Chair to the Dean’s Office by January 8, 2019.
22. What are the guidelines for the establishment and functioning of the Departmental P&T Committee?
The guidelines are available here: Guidelines for Departmental P&T Committees.